Liam Broady vs Justin Boulais Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing the performance stats of Boulais and Broady offers insights into predicting the winner of their upcoming tennis match. In recent months, Broady has demonstrated a marginally superior second serve performance, winning 46.75% of points compared to Boulais' 43.48%. This slight advantage in second serve performance might be crucial, given its strong correlation with match prediction accuracy.

Return game statistics also favor Broady slightly. He has claimed 46.45% of his opponent’s second serve points, whereas Boulais trails slightly with 44.62%. However, Boulais edges out Broady in first serve return stats by winning 31.9% compared to Broady’s 29.23%. These differences in return stats can highlight who might be deemed favored in head-to-head scenarios.

When scrutinizing under pressure performance, Broady again holds the upper hand by saving 58.41% of breakpoints. Boulais, on the other hand, has a breakpoint save percentage of 50.81%. This could suggest Broady is better equipped to handle critical points, an essential factor for in-game betting.

In terms of overall match performance over the past year, Boulais has a slightly better win record of 51.43% (18/17) compared to Broady’s 47.06% (16/18). However, their respective event levels play a pivotal role, with Boulais mostly participating in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, where he has secured a 60% win rate. Conversely, Broady has been more active in Challengers/ITF tournaments with over $10K in prize money, posting a 33.33% win record.

Surface preferences also indicate differences in the playing strengths of both athletes. Boulais performs best on Hard courts, with a 52% winning percentage, while Broady excels on the same surface at a 62% win rate. Boulais struggles more on Clay, whereas Broady’s less favorable surface is Grass, achieving a 36% win percentage. These stats could influence the outcome depending on the surface of this particular match.

Opponent quality further distinguishes the players, with Boulais facing, on average, opponents ranked 401.8 despite a stronger head-to-head win percentage. Broady has been tested against more highly ranked players, with an average opponent rank of 337.21, which may provide more challenging match experience. Deciding set performances reveal Broady as a more clutch player, winning 50% of deciding sets, in contrast to Boulais at 33%.

Both players show an almost identical capacity to capitalize on break point opportunities, with Broady converting 38.24% and Boulais 37.88% of their chances. Yet, when every aspect of their current form, historical data, and in-game pressures is considered, Broady seems slightly more equipped to seize victory in their upcoming bout based on statistical analysis. Hence, the forecast tilts in favor of Broady emerging victorious.